|
|
Overwhelming Support for the Historic Environment
|
|
29/9/2000
|
|
The great majority of people in the UK believe that public funds should be
used to preserve historic buildings. Three-quarters agree that it is
important to preserve the best modern buildings as well as the old. These
are some of the findings of a recent MORI survey, commissioned by English
Heritage, which reveals for the first time what 'heritage' means to all
sectors of society.
The research was commissioned by English Heritage as part of a comprehensive
review of government policies for the historic environment. This report will
be presented to the Government at the end of November.
Key points to emerge from the MORI survey are:
- 98% think the heritage is important to educate children about the past and
that all schoolchildren should be given the opportunity to find out about
England's heritage
- 96% think the heritage is important to educate adults about the past
- 95% think heritage is important for providing places to visit and thing to
see and do, for encouraging tourists to visit, (93%), and for creating jobs
and boosting the economy, (88%)
- 88% agree that it is right that there should be public funding to preserve
the heritage
- 76% disagree that we already preserve too much
- 76% agree that their lives are enriched by the heritage
- 46% think that Black and 45% think that Asian heritage is not adequately
represented
For some people, particularly from ethnic minority groups, England's country
houses and ancient monuments mean little. They want more to be done to make
England's historic environment accessible to them through information, more
inclusive interpretation and education. It emerged from the poll that
everyone has a very personal view of what represents their heritage, and
that most people value both nationally important attractions and key
elements of their own localities.
Only 2% said they had no interest in the heritage whatsoever. The 14% who
had not visited any historic sites in the last year cited lack of time and
interest and feeling unwelcome. The research pointed up a need to raise
awareness of the role of local streets and buildings as well as nationally
important buildings and monuments in creating a high quality environment and
promoting economic and social regeneration in towns and cities and in the
countryside.
The poll indicates that the nation's assumed traditional dislike of modern
architecture no longer exists. Most people disagreed with the statement that
anything after 1950 does not count as heritage and felt it important to
preserve modern buildings for future generations. Support for modern
architecture has undergone an astonishing 10 percentage points rise to 76%
since an English Heritage/MORI poll on this subject in 1997.
The report shows that 51% of the population have made special trips to
historic palaces, houses, gardens, castles and monuments in the last year.
The figure rises to 58% if museums are included.
According to Sir Neil Cossons, Chairman of English Heritage, “We are
delighted by the overwhelming support for the historic environment that this
research reveals. There is a strong feeling, perhaps a moral obligation
people feel, that heritage should be preserved to be passed on to future
generations. Most encouraging was to discover that, above all, people think
the heritage is important to education."
The research was conducted in May-June 2000 and involved four distinct
approaches:
- Omnibus survey research among residents in England
|
| |
|